Tightness and maximal estimates for real stable-attracted walks #
Uniform tightness of the scaled sums yields safe-remainder estimates for Ottaviani's inequality. Together with the normalizer ratio bounds, this gives small-block and finite-horizon maximum control for arbitrary real iid increments.
Reference: P. Billingsley, Convergence of Probability Measures, 2nd ed., 1999, Theorem 9.7 (Ottaviani) and §16 (tightness for processes with independent increments).
The whole sequence of scaled sum laws is uniformly tight (a convergent sequence in the space
of probability measures on ℝ has compact closure; Mathlib's
isTightMeasureSet_of_isCompact_closure). This absorbs the finite beginning of the sequence.
Uniform tightness of S_j / B_n, j ≤ n (audit item 7), quantitative form: the exceedance
probability of the level K B n is small, for all j ≤ n simultaneously, once n is large.
Small-block maxima (Node 6): maxima over blocks of length ≤ δ n + 2 exceed ε B n with
probability at most η, uniformly for large n. The threshold is ε * B n for B n > 0
(eventually). Proof: Ottaviani at half the threshold, with the safe-remainder hypothesis from
small_index_ratio and tightness of the full scaled sequence.
Compact containment on a finite horizon (Node 6): maxima up to ⌊n T⌋₊ stay below
K * B n with probability at least 1 - η, for all large n.
The family {law of S_j / B_n : j ≤ n} over all n is tight (as a set of measures). The
finitely many n with small N contribute finitely many tight laws; B n ≤ 0 is harmless
because the division by B n is then still a measurable map and each law is a single tight law.