The projective stable bridge #
The open law has the prescribed tilted prefixes and converges to zero at its terminal time almost surely. Closing gives a measurable compact path with pinned endpoints and the same strict-prefix laws.
References #
- P. Fitzsimmons, J. Pitman and M. Yor, Markovian bridges: construction, Palm interpretation, and splicing, Seminar on Stochastic Processes 1992, Progr. Probab. 33, Birkhäuser, 1993, 101–134.
- L. Chaumont, Excursion normalisée, méandre et pont pour les processus de Lévy stables, Bull. Sci. Math. 121 (1997), 377–403.
Every closed path has terminal value zero.
Every closed path has terminal left limit zero.
theorem
BGW.StableTrees.map_restrict_stableBridgeLaw_horizon_of_terminal_limit
{θ : ℝ}
(hθ : 1 < θ ∧ θ ≤ 2)
(hpin : ∀ᵐ (f : BridgeOpen) ∂↑(bridgeOpenLaw θ), Filter.Tendsto f.eval (nhdsWithin 1 (Set.Iio 1)) (nhds 0))
(n : ℕ)
:
MeasureTheory.Measure.map (Skorokhod.restrict ⋯) ↑(stableBridgeLaw θ) = bridgePrefixLaw θ (bridgeHorizon n) ⋯ ↑(stableProcessLaw θ (bridgeHorizon n))
Given terminal pinning of the open law, every closed dyadic prefix has its tilted law.
theorem
BGW.StableTrees.map_restrict_stableBridgeLaw_of_terminal_limit
{θ a : ℝ}
(hθ : 1 < θ ∧ θ ≤ 2)
(ha : 0 < a)
(ha1 : a < 1)
(hpin : ∀ᵐ (f : BridgeOpen) ∂↑(bridgeOpenLaw θ), Filter.Tendsto f.eval (nhdsWithin 1 (Set.Iio 1)) (nhds 0))
:
MeasureTheory.Measure.map (Skorokhod.restrict ⋯) ↑(stableBridgeLaw θ) = bridgePrefixLaw θ a ⋯ ↑(stableProcessLaw θ a)
Given terminal pinning of the open law, every strict closed prefix has its tilted law.
theorem
BGW.StableTrees.map_restrict_stableBridgeLaw
{θ a : ℝ}
(hθ : 1 < θ ∧ θ ≤ 2)
(ha : 0 < a)
(ha1 : a < 1)
:
MeasureTheory.Measure.map (Skorokhod.restrict ⋯) ↑(stableBridgeLaw θ) = bridgePrefixLaw θ a ⋯ ↑(stableProcessLaw θ a)
Prefix identity: for 0 < a < 1, the restriction to [0, a] is the tilted stable law
w_a · P_a (bridgePrefixLaw, i.e. withDensity of bridgePrefixWeight).